M.N.: This NYT editorial is the witness to the “Gray Old Lady’s” decline and senility. Of course, Mr. Mueller and his investigation have to continue unabated and with the full support of the American public and the political establishment. They also have to be protected to the maximum by the Congress, and these steps have already been taken. If Mr. Trump fires Mr. Mueller, it will make the situation much worse and might lead to the constitutional crisis. This should not happen. But at the same time, we have to understand the roots and the nature of the criticism directed at the FBI and the DOJ. These are not just pro-Trump sentiments: it is a small part of it, which is on a surface. On a deeper level there is the profound dissatisfaction in the American society, on all strata, with the FBI, their ways and means, their glaring incompetence in practically all the matters, from criminal justice problems, with its scandalous hair and the DNA analysis issues to the problems with the blatant political interference. If the NYTimes does not see these problems (and the paper reported on them in the past itself), it is the self-imposed, willful, and the very dangerous blindness. The FBI has to be investigated in fullest and in-depth, the American people are very unhappy with this domestic spying agency and how it works or does not work. This is not just the matter of the pro-Trump vs. anti-Trump factions within the FBI, this is the matter of what the FBI really is, how it functions, and what are the causes of its many, many alarming dysfunctions. The NYTimes should look into these issues instead of its usual, arrogant but in fact, helpless, naive, and endless pontificating in their endless and fruitless chase to keep up with the changing demands of their changing “middle class” readers.
New York Times
Fox News v. Robert Mueller
New York Times
1 fan: Fire Robert Mueller now. That would be a tremendous mistake, one that ought to alarm any true liberal or conservative. It would strike at the very idea that no American is above the law. The special counsel’s seven-month-old investigation into …
WH lawyer: Mueller’s team completed interviews it requested with White House staff to dateCNN
How Fox Is Undermining the Mueller InvestigationSlate Magazine
How Trump’s Legal Team Is Trying to Bury Robert MuellerVanity Fair
The Nation. –ABC News –New York Magazine –Twitter
all 526 news articles »
Perhaps the most inflammatory rhetoric has come from Ms. Pirro, the host of “Justice With Judge Jeanine” and a “presidential favorite,” according to The Times. “There is a cleansing needed in our F.B.I. and Department of Justice,” Ms. Pirro said Saturday, in her most unhinged rant yet. “It needs to be cleansed of individuals who should not just be fired but who need to be taken out in handcuffs.”
Ms. Pirro named, among others, James Comey, the former F.B.I. director (“so political, so corrupt”); Andrew McCabe, the bureau’s deputy director, apparently in the tank for Hillary Clinton; and Peter Strzok, a top counterintelligence agent whom Mr. Mueller removed from the investigation after learning of private text messages he sent in 2016 criticizing Mr. Trump and praising Mrs. Clinton.
Topping her list of outlaws was, of course, Mr. Mueller, who she said “can’t come up with one piece of evidence!” Maybe she just forgot about the indictments and guilty pleas? Ms. Pirro, a former New York prosecutor and judge, didn’t allege any actual crimes, just that Mr. Mueller and his people are guilty of “attempting to destroy Trump.”
It would be one thing if Ms. Pirro were only spouting off on television. But she is a friend of Mr. Trump’s and has met privately with him and his top advisers to sell her half-cocked theories. After Mr. Trump’s victory last year, she interviewed to be his deputy attorney general, a job that would have empowered her to fire Mr. Mueller on her own.
To put it mildly, this is insane. The primary purpose of Mr. Mueller’s investigation is not to take down Mr. Trump. It’s to protect America’s national security and the integrity of its elections by determining whether a presidential campaign conspired with a foreign adversary to influence the 2016 election — a proposition that grows more plausible every day.
If the president’s supporters are upset about how close that investigation is getting to the Oval Office, they should ask not whether any F.B.I. investigator has ever held an opinion about politics, but rather why Mr. Trump chose as his closest advisers people with a tendency to talk to Russian officials and then fail to tell the truth, again and again, about the nature of those communications. As The Times’s Bret Stephens wrote: “Fire? Maybe not. But we are dying of smoke inhalation.” (Mr. Trump’s defenders might also recall that the president himself prompted Mr. Mueller’s appointment when he fired Mr. Comey, who had been overseeing the Russia investigation.)
When the propagandists say, “Get rid of Mueller,” it’s not the truth they’re trying to protect; it’s Mr. Trump himself. Any genuine interest in objective reality left the building a while ago, replaced by a self-sustaining fantasyland. If it’s hard to understand how roughly three-quarters of Republicans still refuse to accept that Russia interfered in the 2016 election — a fact that is glaringly obvious to everyone else, including the nation’s intelligence community and Mr. Trump’s secretary of state, Rex Tillerson — remember that a majority of the same people continue to believe that President Barack Obama was born in Kenya.
There was a time not too long ago when Republicans in Congress seemed genuinely interested in protecting Mr. Mueller — who, it bears noting, was originally appointed to head the F.B.I. by George W. Bush and who was named special counsel by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, also a Bush appointee. But Fox’s alt-reality vortex has sucked in previously levelheaded members of the G.O.P. like Lindsey Graham, the South Carolina senator who said as recently as October that there would be “holy hell to pay” if Mr. Trump tried to fire Mr. Mueller. Last Friday, Mr. Graham tweeted in support of “a Special Counsel to investigate ALL THINGS 2016 — not just Trump and Russia.” On Monday night, according to Axios, Jay Sekulow, one of Mr. Trump’s personal lawyers, called for a special prosecutor to investigate … the special prosecutor. The tipping point? An article on Fox News’s website about a top Justice Department official’s wife and her work for Fusion GPS, the research firm behind the so-called Steele dossier.
None of these attacks or insinuations are grounded in good faith. The anti-Mueller brigade cares not a whit about possible bias in the Justice Department or the F.B.I. It simply wants the investigation shut down out of a fear of what it might reveal. But if your man is really innocent, what’s the worry?